|
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Audience |
Audience is clearly identifiable and map is geared accordingly. |
Audience is identifiable to some extent, but is too ambiguous. |
Audience is identified, but map is not geared towards the appropriate audience. |
Audience is not identified and map is ambiguous. |
| Mechanics |
No spelling or grammar mistakes. |
Few spelling or grammar mistakes. |
Multiple spelling and grammar mistakes. |
Many spelling and grammar mistakes, making it hard to understand the map's explanation and context. |
| Clarity |
Focus of map is clearly identifiable and purpose is clear. |
Focus of the map is ambiguous, but the purpose is stated clearly in the main description. |
Focus and purpose are ambiguous. |
Focus and purpose are unidentifiable or irrelevant. |
| Sites |
There are at least five sites, and all are relevant to the topic with consistent features (images, descriptions, etc.).
|
There are at least five sites. They are all relevant, but some features are inconsistent or unsubstantial.
|
There are at least five sites. They are all relevant, but many features are inconsistent or unsubstantial. |
There are fewer than five subtopics. |
Map Description
|
The map description clearly defines and conveys the purpose and it is evident that a purpose is reached. |
The purpose of the map is clear and the map’s relevance to the purpose is clear. |
The purpose of the map is understood, but how the map reaches the purpose is unclear. |
The purpose of the map is unclear and seems to have no thought put into the project. |