WRITING IN SCIENCE
Literature Review
Skip To Content
Dashboard
  • Login
  • Dashboard
  • Calendar
  • Inbox
  • History
  • Help
Close
  1. My Dashboard
  2. WRITING IN SCIENCE
  3. Assignments
  4. Literature Review
Spring 2026
  • Home
  • Syllabus
  • Modules
  • Course Evaluations

Literature Review

  • Due Feb 10 by 2pm
  • Points 20
  • Submitting a file upload
  • File Types doc, docx, pdf, rtf, and pages
  • Available until Feb 10 at 2pm
This assignment was locked Feb 10 at 2pm.

The Literature Review is a compilation of documented scholarly sources (anonymously peer reviewed and appearing in a disciplinary publication) about your chosen topic with associated commentary and synthesis. Your Literature Review will help you explore your subject and better understand the conversation around it. It is a productive way to identify and engage sources that you may (but are not obligated to) incorporate into the literature review component of your Research Paper. (Also keep in mind that you can check sources' bibliographies to find related works.) This assignment also will give you experience using a citation manager, which is an important part of a science writer's process. We will explore using generative AI to develop this review, but you should be the author of your work.

Your Literature Review will consist of two sections:

  1. A list of five documented scholarly sources from within the last ten years with annotations. The structure for each entry is as follows:
    1. Full citation
    2. One sentence that states the work's thesis (the answer to its research question)
    3. Two or three sentences of summary that identify the work's main points (its abstract will be helpful here)
    4. One paragraph that identifies gaps or unknowns about the topic that the source leaves unaddressed

  2. A few pages that synthesize the sources into a coherent whole. This should provide an integrated analysis of the works’ positions on your topic, identifying where they agree, where they disagree, and where particular works forward unique perspectives that the others do not. Your goal here is to provide an overview of the research literature on the subject so that you can later identify a knowledge gap that your research will address. Your work should align with Montouri's Links to an external site. (2005) assertion that literature reviews are spaces for generative inquiry.  Through curation of and conversation with your sources' ideas, you can gain a rich understanding of your own position. The synthesis thus must go beyond simply summarizing each article in succession; it must discuss the subject as a whole, referring to the articles' consensus and distinctions where informative.

The Literature Review will be uploaded as a file. The document should be double spaced and sources should be in alphabetical order. The first line of each citation should be flush with the left margin; any subsequent citation lines should be indented 1/2 inch. All lines of annotations should be indented 1 inch. Please indicate the citation manager and citation format (current AMA Links to an external site., APA Links to an external site., Chicago Links to an external site., MLA Links to an external site., or other) you are using in the title of your Annotated Bibliography. The examples and template below may be helpful.

  • Example 1 Download Example 1
  • Example 2 Download Example 2
  • Example 3 Download Example 3

[your name]

ENG 393

Spring 2026

Dr. Tirrell

[citation manager and citation format] Literature Review: [topic]

[first source's citation first line]

     [any subsequent lines of citation]

          [annotation lines]

[second source's citation first line]

     [any subsequent lines of citation]

          [annotation lines]

 

[follow this pattern for entries three, four, and five]

 

[pages synthesizing sources]

1770750000 02/10/2026 02:00pm
Please include a description
Additional Comments:
Rating max score to > pts
Please include a rating title

Rubric

Find Rubric
Please include a title
Find a Rubric
Title
You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
Can't change a rubric once you've started using it.  
Title
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion
threshold: 5 pts
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank
0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
  / 5 pts
--
Additional Comments
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion
threshold: 5 pts
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
5 to >0 pts Full Marks blank
0 to >0 pts No Marks blank_2
This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
pts
  / 5 pts
--
Additional Comments
Total Points: 5 out of 5
Previous
Next
Preliminary Research Method Design