"New technique finds Earth-like planet"
http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/space/01/25/space.planet.reut/index.html
The linked article covered about the discovery of a new planet with a atmosphere much like ours. The planet is habitable enough to be considered "Earth-like" which adds to the discussion, "Are we alone?" Aside from that the main point that the story tried to get across was how this planet was discovered.
The way this new method works is using a network of telescopes to focus on light from distant stars and waiting for the opportunity for another star massive enough to move infront of the observed star and the telescope so the light from observed star is magnified. The light is bent around the interfearing star the same way light is bent from water, and due to the magnifying nature it is possible to observe these new planets.
This new method of discovering planets actually makes it easier to find more habital planets because the orbit of the planet has to be close enough to the star to show up. Planets that orbit too far away from the start wont be seen with this new method.
With all these new discoveries of habital planets, and new methods in finding habital planets are you starting to open up to a possibility that there can be life of any form living on these 'habital' planets? With over a 100 billion stars in our own galaxy, and more galaxies with an equal amount of galaxies in our universe, do you feel that is rational to say that there is definately life elsewher, or do you feel that we are on earth for a reason, and its just us in an endless pool of space. Are you thinking contrary to both those philosophies and think that our univerese is so large that we are so insignificant that it doesn't matter wether we find new stars or planets because we are just 'along for the ride'?