This podcast takes a look at our government while thinking about Stuart Blythe's article "Agencies, Ecologies, and the Mundane Artifacts in Our Midst." Blythe tells us that one person can bring about significant change in an institution. Does this apply to the government? Do we really have the agency to make changes to the way our country is run? These questions and more are posed and discussed.
Black Silk by Syenta is licensed under a Attribution Noncommercial (3.0).
Comments
Individual Acts
Courtney, your focus on Blythe’s article and his claims about agency and change in particular create an opportunity to think about individual acts, acts of social justice, and institutional change. I think that your existential question of whether an individual can in fact inspire change on a large level is one that constantly comes up in terms of citizen involvement and influence in government. As you note, it is hard to know whether or not one person’s vote makes a huge difference later on. When you discussed Rosa Park’s actions and the change that she sparked, it occurred to me that using Rosa Parks as an example enlightens this question further. I think that what we miss when we wonder whether or not individual acts can create large social change is exactly what Blythe tries to point out in this article. He explains that we are part of ecology that works together and inherently influences each other: “Individuals seldom act autonomously. Remember that actions are constrained by the systems in which we work” (183). By thinking about Rosa Parks as a member of a particular functioning institution (Civil Rights Movement), it is possible to understand that individual acts are never really “individual” as they are always influenced by and working alongside the acts of the group. What many people do not know is that Rosa Park’s decision to stay in her seat on the bus was pre-planned by a group of black activists. In fact, they had wanted to use Claudette Colvin, a young black girl who was arrested when she refused to give up her seat, to make the social point that they did with Rosa Parks, but Colvin got pregnant and was no longer seen by the activists as a good representative. This allows us to think about how “individual” acts are always linked to the acts of others, and this makes it possible to create the change. Also, this brings up the question of the “right moment” (think about White’s use of Kairos in Kaironomia). In addition to relying on the environment in which they occur, the success of individual acts also relies on strategy in regards to factors like time.
There were a few problems with the mic and keeping the volume of the different sections of your podcast at a consistent level.
Thank you
Thank you for your comments. They were very insightful. You are correct, I didn't really touch on the idea of the individual within the ecology as much as I probably should have. This being a big part of his article, I really should have talked more about how we as citizens and voters are a part of the system. I did not know that little bit of information about Rosa Parks and Claudette Colvin. Knowing this changes things and makes Blythe's article make even more sense. Your response really put things into perspective for me, so thank you. I am sorry about the sound problems, I thought I had them all even, but I should have listened to it one more time to double-check before posting.
~C~