Course Information

Course Description

ENGL 419: Multimedia Writing

Time: Tuesdays and Thursdays 4:30-5:45
Location: BRNG B275
Instructor: J. Tirrell
Contact: jtirrell@purdue.edu
Office: HEAV 207
Office hours: Tuesdays and Thursdays 3:00-4:00

Course Overview

This course helps students practice and understand the principles of multimedia design and implementation, with emphasis on writing in multimedia contexts. Students closely examine various multimedia products, doing oral and/or written analyses of a number of such pieces. Course readings focus on how different media communicate meaning, shape our reactions, and interact with one another. Students propose, plan, and develop a a number of individual and/or group multimedia projects, including those for the Web, using a variety of technologies that support and enhance the presentation of content in multimedia forms.

Course Goals

Responsibility Project Management Teamwork

Course Readings

Readings will be provided online. Students are responsible for printing texts, reading them, and bringing them to class.

Required Technology

Be aware that routine work with technology is a major component of this class. Students need not be technological experts to succeed in this class; the class's purpose is education and improvement. Nevertheless, be aware that digital technology exposure is integral to the class, and computer problems are not valid excuses for incomplete work. Learn and practice the core principle of digital data work: redundant backup. Digital technology will fail you; be prepared for that eventuality.

Grade Breakdown

project 1: Data Mapping = 20%
project 2: Packaging and Promotion = 20%
project 3: Client Service Learning = 20%
midterm = 20%
homework = 20%

Late Work

Late work is not accepted.

Collaborative Work

Collaborative work is a required component of the course. Your project team will be responsible for its own management and progress. A Collaborative Evaluation Form will be completed by all group members to assess the contributions of group members.

Wide Online Audience

Because of the nature of this course, student work may be accessible to a wide audience through the Web. A student's grades, of course, never will be shared. Students in this class must explicitly allow their work to be viewed by a wide audience by signing the Course Contract. If this is a problem for a student, the student should withdraw from the class.

Attendance and Punctuality

Because class meets only twice per week, attendance is vital and mandatory. Role is taken shortly after class begins. If a student is not present when role is taken, that student will be counted absent. Students may miss three class meetings without direct grade penalty. Every absence thereafter lowers a student's final grade by a full letter. If there are extraordinary circumstances that will prevent a student from attending class, he or she must contact the instructor beforehand. The maxim this class abides by is for all members of the class to show respect to one another by meeting at designated times and places prepared to work.

Academic Integrity

Purdue students and their instructors are expected to adhere to guidelines set forth by the Dean of Students in "Academic Integrity: A Guide for Students." If you are uncertain if some element of your work constitutes plagiarism, please speak with the course instructor. The point of any class is to educate, not to punish. Nevertheless, the consequences of plagiarism are appropriately dire. Plagiarism simply should never be an option for any student.

Special Needs Statement

I and the university will make every effort to accommodate special needs students. If you require special accommodations, please see me privately within the first week of class to make arrangements. According to university policy, students must register with Adaptive Programs in the Office of the Dean of Students before classroom accommodations can be provided.

Calendar

Follow the links at the bottom of this page for a schedule of activities and assignments for each week this semester. Each week is divided into Tuesday and Thursday class periods.

This course calendar is subject to change throughout the semester.

Week 1

Tuesday 8/21

In Class: For Next Time:

Thursday 8/23

Due Today: In Class: For Next Time:

Week 2

Tuesday 8/28

Due Today: In Class: For Next Time:

Thursday 8/30

Due Today: In Class: For Next Time:
  • Read Compose, Design, Advocate excerpt 2
  • Bring in (or locate online) a sample data map. Bring in a written rhetorical analysis of it of no more than 2 pages using the elements outlined in Compose, Design, Advocate as a guide (sense of purpose, audience, context, strategies, arrangement, medium).

Week 3

Tuesday 9/4

Due Today:
  • Written rhetorical analysis of sample data map
In Class:
  • Share analyses of sample data maps
  • Begin design plan for your data map
For Next Time:
  • Design plan for your data map

Thursday 9/6

Due Today:
  • Design plan for your data map
In Class:
  • Share design plans
  • Begin data map first drafts
For Next Time:

Week 4

Tuesday 9/11

Due Today:
  • Data map first draft posted to Project 1 First Drafts image gallery
In Class: For Next Time:

Thursday 9/13

Due Today:
  • Data map second draft posted to Project 1 Second Drafts image gallery (I will post feedback as a comment by Saturday)
In Class:
  • Postmortem discussion
  • Last questions about Project 1
  • Project 2 introduction
For Next Time:

Week 5

Tuesday 9/18

Due Today: In Class: For Next Time:

Thursday 9/20

Due Today: In Class:
  • Discuss Calfee
  • Analyze student packages
For Next Time:

Week 6

Tuesday 9/25

Due Today: In Class: For Next Time:

Thursday 9/27

Due Today: In Class:
  • Discuss Solomon
  • Analyze successful promotional materials
For Next Time:

Week 7

Tuesday 10/2

Due Today:
  • Comment on reading response 8
  • Promotional material design plan draft (electronic, not print, format please)
In Class:
  • Finish promotional material analysis
  • Discuss Marchand
  • Promotional material design plan draft workshop
For Next Time:
  • CD package draft

Thursday 10/4

Due Today:
  • CD package draft
In Class: For Next Time:

Week 8

Tuesday 10/9

no class

Thursday 10/11

Due Today: In Class:
  • no class
For Next Time:
  • Project 2 (CD package with design plan, promotional material with design plan, postmortem) final draft

Week 9

Tuesday 10/16

In Class: For Next Time:
  • In-class portion of midterm

Thursday 10/18

In Class:
  • In-class portion of midterm
  • Get take-home portion of midterm
For Next Time:
  • Project 2 (CD package with design plan, promotional material with design plan, postmortem) final draft

Week 10

Tuesday 10/23

Due Today:
  • Project 2 (CD package with design plan, promotional material with design plan, postmortem) final draft
In Class: For Next Time:
  • complete take-home portion of midterm

Thursday 10/25

Due Today:
  • Take-home portion of midterm
In Class:
  • Group work activity
For Next Time:

Week 11

Tuesday 10/30

Due Today: In Class: For Next Time:
  • Individually write a design plan draft for your group's website

Thursday 11/1

Due Today:
  • Individual design plan draft for your group's website
In Class: For Next Time:
  • Design technique seminar day 1
    • Group 3 (Brian Williams, Jose Salazar, Julianne Fabian, Ruben Sethi): Web design with Dreamweaver
    • Group 5 (Adam Strantz, Julie Jansen, Kyle Wiedman): Legitimate use of open source web templates and creative commons graphics

Week 12

Tuesday 11/6

In Class:
  • Design technique seminar day 1
    • Group 3 (Brian Williams, Jose Salazar, Julianne Fabian, Ruben Sethi): Web design with Dreamweaver
    • Group 5 (Adam Strantz, Julie Jansen, Kyle Wiedman): Legitimate use of open source web templates and creative commons graphics
  • Continue group Gantt chart
For Next Time:
  • Design technique seminar day 2
    • Group 1 (Daniel Bortnick, David Ayodele, Markus Horstmeyer, Michael Mann): Information architecture (arrangement) in web design
    • Group 4 (Brent Brewington, Dan Paulat, Jason Ortiz, Ramsey Saba): Designing web graphics with Photoshop

Thursday 11/8

In Class:
  • Design technique seminar day 2
    • Group 1 (Daniel Bortnick, David Ayodele, Markus Horstmeyer, Michael Mann): Information architecture (arrangement) in web design
    • Group 4 (Brent Brewington, Dan Paulat, Jason Ortiz, Ramsey Saba): Designing web graphics with Photoshop
  • Finish group Gantt chart
For Next Time:
  • Design technique seminar day 3
    • Group 2 (Acacia Wood, Aris Aurellano, Brian Otten, Sarah Wilson): Web design with CSS and XHTML

Week 13

Tuesday 11/13

In Class:
  • Design technique seminar day 3
    • Group 2 (Acacia Wood, Aris Aurellano, Brian Otten, Sarah Wilson): Web design with CSS and XHTML
  • Decide what to do during website workshop day 1
  • Finish Gantt chart
For Next Time:
  • Website workshop day 1

Thursday 11/15

In Class:
  • Website workshop day 1
  • Decide what to do during website workshop day 2
For Next Time:
  • Website workshop day 2

Week 14

Tuesday 11/20

In Class:
  • Website workshop day 2
  • Revised design plan due today
  • Draft website due today

Thursday 11/22

no class

Week 15

Tuesday 11/27

In Class:
  • Respond to client feedback

Thursday 11/29

In Class:
  • Respond to client feedback

Week 16

Tuesday 12/4

In Class:
  • Respond to client feedback
For Next Time:
  • Project 3 (final design plan, final website) due

Thursday 12/6

Due Today:
  • Project 3 (final design plan, final website) due with master website files
  • A short document (approximately one page) that tells the client how to make basic changes
In Class:
  • Respond to client feedback
  • Produce a short document (approximately one page) that tells the client how to make basic changes
For Next Time (12/7):

Assignments

As outlined in the Course Description, the overall grade in this class has five components: three projects, a midterm, and homework. This section provides an overview of these elements.

Projects:

Project 1: Data Mapping
Project 2: Packaging and Promotion
Project 3: Client Service Learning

Midterm:

The Midterm examination consists of two parts: an in-class portion which covers class terms, concepts, and readings; a take-home portion that invites a practical solution to a multimedia design problem.

Homework:

Homework includes in-class work, reading responses, written homework, blog posts, etc. The homework grade component comprises all the minor assignments necessary for the progress of the course. Most of these assignments are worth one or two points each. The final homework grade is a cumulative score based upon how many points you gained against how many were possible for the semester. The semester total is usually somewhere around 50 points.

Project 1: Data Mapping

For Project 1, we will explore how information is transmitted through visual representation. Data mapping or data visualization comprises a wide range of methods, but their focus is the same: to communicate something to a specific audience for a particular purpose.

Each student will produce a data map. The choice of what data to present, what audience to target, and what purpose to accomplish is up to the student. Examples of data maps include INA's Interactive Mapping, INA's Iconographics, Worldmapper, The Shape of Song, and Joseph Jacinto Mora's "Nuestra Señora la Reina de Los Angeles de Porciúncula."

To produce their maps, students will do critical research over visual rhetoric. Students also will analyze the work of others and their own work.

A student's data map may be delivered in a print, digital, or other format, but all projects must be organized, accessible, and professional.

Project Deliverables:

  • thorough design plan
  • data map
  • postmortem

Due Dates:

  • Data map first drafts due by the beginning of class on Tuesday, Sept. 11, to the Project 1 First Drafts gallery
  • Data map second drafts due by the beginning of class on Thursday, Sept. 13, to the Project 1 Second Drafts gallery
  • Project 1 final draft (design plan, data map, postmortem) due Tuesday, Sept. 18

Grading:
Breakdown

  • Design Plan = 10%
  • Data Map = 80%
  • Postmortem = 10%

Rubrics
Excellent design plans will:

  • account for all the design plan elements outlined in Compose, Design, Advocate
  • proceed through a structure based on the sequence of design plan elements in Compose, Design, Advocate
  • provide a coherent narrative rather than a collection of disconnected parts
  • speak in third person about the data map and how it functions, not in first person about the designer's process of creation
  • speak in present tense about how the data map works, not in the future tense about what it will or might do
  • demonstrate thoroughly what rhetorical purpose the data map intends, who is targeted, and how the message is to be delivered
  • demonstrate coherence between the design plan and the resulting data map
  • be in a finished, polished format appropriate for an academic/professional reader, including appropriate grammar and mechanics

Excellent data maps will:

  • communicate data in a clear and organized way through a primarily visual format
  • reveal information not easily transmitted in another format
  • achieve a specific rhetorical purpose by targeting a specific audience
  • have an appearance appropriate to the audience and situation, including appropriate grammar and mechanics

Excellent postmortems will:

  • account thoroughly for all the sections of the postmortem form
  • focus on the designer's process of creating the data map
  • provide valuable insight into project successes, difficulties, and what lessons have been learned going forward
  • provide documentation that would be necessary in a professional setting
  • be in a finished, polished format appropriate for an academic/professional reader, including appropriate grammar and mechanics

Applicable Resources:

Applicable Links:

Project 2: Packaging and Promotion

For Project 2, we will work with a very familiar subject: commerce. More specifically, we will be dealing with pragmatic issues of product packaging and promotion. Like all acts of communication, particularly those that are explicitly persuasive, advertising is thoroughly rhetorical.

Each student will select five songs from our class song pool. These five songs will be used to create a compilation CD. Each student will produce an appropriate complete package for the CD (covers, jewel case liner, disk with label, etc.) and one promotional material that targets a specific, appropriate audience. Promotional materials include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • animated .gif banner
  • Flash banner
  • radio spot
  • video spot
  • newspaper advertisement
  • magazine advertisement
  • flyer
  • poster
  • other

CD packages and promotional materials should be complete and of a professional, marketable caliber. Each CD package and promotional item should be accompanied by a thorough design plan. Neither the CD package nor any promotional materials may contain any copyrighted material.

To produce their packages and promotional materials, students will read critical texts over package and promotional material design. Students will also analyze existing professional examples and their own work.

Project Deliverables:
  • CD package (with design plan)
  • promotional item (with design plan)
  • postmortem
Due Dates:
  • CD package design plan draft due 9/25
  • promotional material design plan draft due 10/2
  • CD package draft due 10/4
  • promotional material draft due 10/11
  • Project 2 final draft (CD package and design plan, promotional material and design plan, postmortem) due 10/16
Grading:
Breakdown
  • CD package design plan = 5%
  • promotional material design plan = 5%
  • CD package = 40%
  • promotional material = 40%
  • postmortem = 10%
Rubrics
Excellent design plans will:
  • account for all the design plan elements outlined in Compose, Design, Advocate
  • proceed through a structure based on the sequence of design plan elements in Compose, Design, Advocate
  • provide a coherent narrative rather than a collection of disconnected parts
  • speak in third person about the data map and how it functions, not in first person about the designer's process of creation
  • speak in present tense about how the data map works, not in the future tense about what it will or might do
  • demonstrate thoroughly what rhetorical purpose the data map intends, who is targeted, and how the message is to be delivered
  • demonstrate coherence between the design plan and the resulting data map
  • be in a finished, polished format appropriate for an academic/professional reader, including appropriate grammar and mechanics
Excellent CD packages and promotional materials will:
  • achieve a specific purpose by targeting a specific audience
  • have a professional, polished appearance appropriate to a commercial product
  • demonstrate coherence between the design plan and the resulting work
  • display grammar and mechanics appropriate to situation in both material and design plan
Excellent postmortems will:
  • account thoroughly for all the sections of the postmortem form
  • focus on the designer's process of creating the data map
  • provide valuable insight into project successes, difficulties, and what lessons have been learned going forward
  • provide documentation that would be necessary in a professional setting
  • be in a finished, polished format appropriate for an academic/professional reader, including appropriate grammar and mechanics
Applicable Resources: Applicable Links:

Project 3: Client Service Learning

For Project 3, we will be working with a client organization to revise its website. Class members will work in small groups each comprising three or four members. Each group will produce a revised website, but only one will be selected and used by the organization. Only the group whose website is selected by the client will receive full credit for the "final website" grade component. All groups will remit their master website files to the instructor. The selected group will provide assistance to get its design up and running on the client's server, but the group is not expected to provide continuing support. The groups are as follows:

Group 1 wiki
Group 1 chatroom
Group 2 wiki
Group 2 chatroom
Group 3 wiki
Group 3 chatroom
Group 4 wiki
Group 4 chatroom
Group 5 wiki
Group 5 chatroom
Daniel Bortnick Acacia Wood Brian Williams Brent Brewington Adam Strantz
David Ayodele Aris Aurellano Jose Salazar Dan Paulat Julie Jansen
Markus Horstmeyer Brian Otten Julianne Fabian Jason Ortiz Kyle Wiedman
Michael Mann Sarah Wilson Ruben Sethi Ramsey Saba

To produce their websites, groups will do rhetorical research through course readings and activities. Groups will also use specifications and feedback from the organization's contact.

At the end of the project, each group member will complete a postmortem that evaluates the contributions of the various group members, including himself or herself. The group's postmortems will be the basis for each student's "individual postmortem" grade component.

Project Deliverables:
  • design plan
  • final website
  • individual postmortem
Due Dates:
  • draft design plan 11/1
  • revised design plan 11/20
  • draft website 11/20
  • final design plan 12/6
  • final website 12/6
  • individual Project 3 postmortem 12/7
Grading:
Breakdown
  • design plan = 10%
  • final website = 80% (only the group whose site is selected will receive full credit for this component)
  • postmortem = 10% (formed from a student's average numerical score on his or her group's postmortems)
Rubrics
Excellent Design Plans will:
  • explicate the goals of the website and how it achieves them
  • demonstrate analysis of the website's audience, context, purpose, strategies, medium, and arrangement
  • be in a concise, professional, polished format appropriate to the audience and situation
  • display grammar and mechanics appropriate to situation
Excellent websites will:
  • be made according to the specifications of the organization
  • respond to feedback provided by the organization's contact person
  • target a specific audience for a specific purpose
  • have a functional and useable navigational structure
  • have a consistent, appealing visual style
  • be thoroughly professional and polished

The postmortem grade is formed from the average of a person's evaluation scores.

Applicable Resources: Applicable Links: