I'm not sure what you mean by funny voices. The woman host sounded decently normal, and the man apparently had a cold so that was understandable.

I found the plug at the beginning a little much but understandable to support the podcast.

I appreciated the brisk pace of the podcast. Tells a little bit about the film, several I had not heard of (though most of them don't look interesting at all) and whether they are worth your time or not. It seems like the are pretty impartial in terms of genre, no favoring on over the other.

Overall a strong podcast. However I again don't really understand the funny voices point you were bringing up. There are slight differences between the MP3 and the one on the site, but only a few. It seemed like the same podcast to me. Maybe I'm just deaf.

I think that this podcast is great for people wanting to see a movie that particular week. I like how they gave a brief description of each film and talk about the main actors in the movie. I find this very helpful because sometimes previews can be misleading. To have someone tell me a little more about the movie would give me an incentive to go watch the movie if I was considering going to the theater.

I did not hear the funny voices either. I thought what I believed was their "normal" voices sounded great and was not too fast. The message was clear, and the arrangement was also planned well. I would listen to this again when I want to go to the theater to get an idea of what movie to go see.

I didn't hear anything odd about the voices either... as for the pacing, I thought it was pretty good as it was. If they had slowed it down it might become boring as there were many movies to cover. The only problem I noticed was that these people actually don't seem to be critiquing anything! By the title one would expect movie reviews; that is, opinions on whether or not the motion pictures discussed were effective pieces of entertainment. Contrary to those expectations, listeners are instead presented with the level of adult content in the material (pointless since this can be easily determined through the MPAA rating), a basic plot overview, a snippet of sound from the film, and the conclusion that yes, this movie MIGHT do well in the box office, and yes, if you like this kind of movie it MIGHT be a good one for you. They fail to bring up any negative aspects of the films they discuss, which is absolutely absurd unless they truly believe ALL these movies are flawless works of art. In fact, many of the films deemed "good" by this mindless duo have achieved horrible ratings on sites like Rotten Tomatoes, which averages the ratings of critical reviews across the nation. This annoying habit of maintaining a positive opinion made the overall "review" relatively pointless, more an advertisement for upcoming features than an assessment of cinematic quality.